“O mundo estaria se ‘desterritorializando’? Sob o impacto dos processos de globalização que ‘comprimiram’ o espaço e o tempo, (…) o que restaria de nossos ‘territórios’, de nossa ‘geografia’?
Fonte: HAESBAERT, Rogério. O mito da desterritorialização
– do fim dos territórios à multiterritorialidade. 2ª edição.
Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2006. pp. 19 e 20.
Na geografia, o debate contemporâneo sobre territorialização, desterritorialização e reterritorialização conclui acerca
- A) de uma tendência ao enfraquecimento dos controles territoriais, em consequência de uma rearticulação das velocidades na sociedade do movimento.
- B) do predomínio da fluidez sobre a estabilidade, resultando numa sociedade de fluxos sem necessidade de base material.
- C) do aumento da hibridização cultural e, portanto, de uma multiplicidade de identidades que esvazia o território.
- D) da formação de uma multiplicidade de territorialidades, que vai dos limites fixos do gueto aos mais flexíveis territórios-rede.
Resposta:
The world would not be "deterritorializing" itself. Under the impact of globalization processes that "compressed" space and time, (...), what would be left of our "territories", of our "geography"?
In geography, the contemporary debate about territorialization, deterritorialization, and reterritorialization concludes that there is a tendency towards the weakening of territorial controls, resulting in a rearticulation of velocities in the society of movement.
This debate highlights three main points:
- A) The weakening of territorial controls, leading to a rearticulation of velocities in the society of movement.
- B) The predominance of fluidity over stability, resulting in a society of flows without the need for a material base.
- C) The increase in cultural hybridization, leading to a multiplicity of identities that empty the territory.
- D) The formation of a multiplicity of territorialities, going from the fixed limits of the ghetto to more flexible territorial networks.
The correct answer is D) The formation of a multiplicity of territorialities, going from the fixed limits of the ghetto to more flexible territorial networks.
This answer makes sense because, in the context of globalization, territorialities are no longer fixed or limited to specific spaces. Instead, they become more fluid and flexible, taking on different forms and networks. This is evident in the way people and cultures interact, forming new identities and communities that transcend traditional territorial boundaries.
In this sense, the concept of territory is transformed, and new forms of territoriality emerge, characterized by flexibility, mobility, and interconnectedness. This multiplicity of territorialities allows for a more dynamic and adaptive understanding of space and place, one that is better suited to the complexities of the globalized world.
Deixe um comentário