Segundo Lana de Souza Cavalcanti (2008), a separação entre teoria e prática está vinculada à divisão social do trabalho, que acarretou na hierarquização das atividades. Nesta concepção, a teoria faz parte da dimensão da ciência enquanto a prática está associada à dimensão das escolas e dos professores. Assim, as teorias determinam a realidade prática e o saber científico é mais confiável do que os saberes envolvidos na prática dos professores nas escolas. Para que essa concepção seja superada, a autora propõe que:
- A) a formação do professor seja o momento da discussão teórica e a prática seja o momento da aplicação das teorias.
- B) a teoria e a prática sejam pensadas como duas dimensões da realidade indissociáveis e não necessariamente realizadas em lugares e por pessoas diferentes.
- C) a linearidade existente partindo da teoria para a prática seja rompida somente nos ambientes escolares e nos cursos de formação de professores.
- D) a hierarquização entre teoria e prática seja superada apenas nos ambientes acadêmicos.
- E) os professores sejam submetidos a avaliações contínuas a fim de diagnosticar o domínio das teorias geográficas.
Resposta:
The correct answer is B) The theory and practice should be thought of as two inseparable dimensions of reality,<|begin_of_text|>2019) and necessarily realized in different places and by different people.
This response is based on the idea that Lana de Souza Cavalcanti (2008) proposes that the separation between theory and practice is linked to the social division of labor, which led to the hierarchization of activities. In this conception, theory is part of the scientific dimension, while practice is associated with the dimension of schools and teachers. Therefore, theories determine practical reality, and scientific knowledge is more reliable than the knowledge involved in teachers' practices in schools.
To overcome this conception, the author suggests that theory and practice should be thought of as two inseparable dimensions of reality, which are necessarily realized in different places and by different people. This means that theory and practice are not separate entities, but rather complementary aspects of the same reality.
By adopting this perspective, it is possible to break with the traditional view that theory is superior to practice, and that practice is merely the application of theoretical knowledge. Instead, theory and practice are seen as intertwined and mutually influential, and both are necessary for a complete understanding of reality.
This approach also implies that teachers and researchers should work together to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the world, rather than perpetuating the division between theory and practice. By recognizing the importance of both dimensions, we can foster a more nuanced and integrated approach to knowledge and reality.
Deixe um comentário