Continua após a publicidade..
Which sequence best completes the text below”Derived (1)____ “vita,” meaning life (2)____ Latin, vitamins are necessary to convert food (3)____ energy. When people don’t get enough vitamins, they suffer diseases like scurvy and rickets. The question isn’t whether people need vitamins. They do. The questions are how much do they need, and do they get enough (4)____ foods?” (Adapted from http:// http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09)
Which sequence best completes the text below
“Derived (1)____ “vita,” meaning life (2)____ Latin, vitamins
are necessary to convert food (3)____ energy. When people don’t
get enough vitamins, they suffer diseases like scurvy and
rickets. The question isn’t whether people need vitamins. They
do. The questions are how much do they need, and do they get
enough (4)____ foods?”
are necessary to convert food (3)____ energy. When people don’t
get enough vitamins, they suffer diseases like scurvy and
rickets. The question isn’t whether people need vitamins. They
do. The questions are how much do they need, and do they get
enough (4)____ foods?”
(Adapted from http:// http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09)
- A)from - in - in - out
- B)of - in - into - of
- C)of - of - in - in
- D)of - of - in - out
- E)from - in - into - in
Resposta:
A alternativa correta é E)
A sequência correta que completa o texto é a alternativa E) from - in - into - in.
Justificativa:
1. "Derived (1)____ 'vita'": Utiliza-se "from" pois indica origem (derivado de).
2. "meaning life (2)____ Latin": Usa-se "in" para indicar que "vita" tem esse significado em latim.
3. "convert food (3)____ energy": A preposição "into" é a correta, pois indica transformação (converter comida em energia).
4. "get enough (4)____ foods": A preposição "in" é adequada para indicar obtenção através dos alimentos (obter vitaminas nos alimentos).
Portanto, a sequência from - in - into - in mantém a coerência gramatical e semântica do texto.
Deixe um comentário